One Planet, One People

Beyond "Us vs. Them"

This book, published by Prometheus and released on September 1, 2004, is the most definitive statement I have produced so far about how my progressive humanist world view can illuminate contemporary world issues, as well as the age-old questions of who we are, where we came from, and why .

A central thesis of the book is that human societies have evolved over the last fifty thousand years not only by adapting to environmental change, but by competing with each other. In this competition, the "us versus them" syndrome has been a key element enabling successful societies to survive. Throughout this evolutionary period the most successful societies have grown larger and more efficient at meeting the needs of their people. But now we are at a breaking point. Global problems have appeared that urgently require global solutions. International and interethnic competition must be controlled, subordinated to some form of global authority, or the "us vs. them" syndrome will have catastrophic consequences. Humanity is moving out of adolescence into a new stage. President Bush's first term has been a disastrous case of leadership moving the world's most powerful country in exactly the wrong direction.

I draw on my experience as a diplomat to propose the broad outlines of a solution. A coalition of countries that have achieved stable democratic systems of governance will have to cooperate closely among themselves and with a strengthened UN while they reach out to zones of instability and gradually deal with the roots of that instability. Eventually our descendants will enjoy a world order that still contains and even rejoices in diversity, but basic human rights will be respected everywhere, the worst inequalities between rich and poor will be removed, and everyone will cooperate in meeting environmental concerns.

Is this utopian, and impractical? Not in the least, unless we lose our quintessentially human capacity to imagine things that have not happened yet, but could happen, if we cooperate to achieve them. It is this capacity to imagine that hit our ancestors like a Promethean lightning bolt 50,000 years ago, and propelled us out of caves into megacities. We imagine, we set our goals, we achieve. That's the progressive part. The humanist part is, we do it for all of us.

The book is based on modern science in general, and evolutionary theory in particular. Societies evolve, as well as species, but the rules governing their evolution are somewhat different. For one thing, group selection is more important than is the case in biological evolution. To lay a foundation for this examination of how societies evolve, I describe the complex world of the human mind, which exists not just in separate minds alone, but in a continuum that represents the collective thinking of all people, past as well as present. This universe of the mind contains sonnets and symphonies as well as techniques and rules of behavior, and it rivals the biophysical world in its complexity and richness. It is the medium in which we think. Its richness and diversity is what makes humans unique in the biophysical world. It is just as "real" in its way as the "real" physical world around us.

The ties that bind people together into cooperatively functioning societies are mostly mental constructs rather than features of the physical environment. I analyse how creatures of the mind are born, evolve, and die, drawing on the latest findings of the evolutionary psychologists, linguists, anthropologists, and others. In the process, I establish a new context in which we can look again at many old questions, like:

--What is consciousness? Is there such a thing as a human soul? Is there life after death?

--How did religion originate? Is God only a creature of the human imagination, or something more?

--Can there be ethics without God? How did ethics arise and what purposes do they serve? Are there objective standards of morality, or is everything culture-based?

--What is the essence of democracy? Are there any truly objective criteria that will help us judge whether trends or events in a given country help or hinder progress toward greater democracy?

--What is the proper role of the scientific method in helping us judge emerging moral issues?

You won't find all the answers spelled out in my book, but if you think about my views, you'll almost certainly develop some fresh thoughts about them. And what do you expect from a simple, clearly written book only 139 pages long?

“...can Darwin's theory of natural selection explain morality, love, evil, life on Mars...?”

(Quoted from the lead-in for an article on evolution in the January/February, 2002 issue of Psychology Today )

Well, this book is based on Darwin’s thought, and it answers the first three, which isn't too bad...

**************

Amazon.com has my new book listed, and at an attractive price ($16)

Carl Coon 9/21/04


Back to the Home Page